Recent Pubs, 16 May

This week in New Pubs we feature an edited volume on zomian boderlands, with chapters by Cederlof, Pachuau, Möller, and Tharaphi Than and Htoo May; then Bagh and Das on how political economy impacts the security of religious minorities in Bangladesh and Myanmar; last but not least, Suante writes on the history and politics of schooling in Myanmar.

This week we will put all the citations here (because there are so many); see our Recent Publications page for abridged citations and for all of the citations in past weeks.

source: internet

Events? 1 this week… let us know about more

We have one exciting event on our calendar this week – Dipannita Maria Bagh, of North-Eastern Hill University (Shillong, India) will talk about “India’s Approach to the Myanmar Crisis,” at ANU’s MRC 2022 Dialogue Series. Register here.

But after that… the cupboard is bare! Please let us know about upcoming talks or events so we can promote them here.

Dipannita Maria Bagh

CFP: ASEAS (UK) Conf 2022 (zoom) – 8-10 Sept 2022

Online via Zoom | Call for Panels and Papers – extended deadline, 27 May 2022 | email proposals to: aseasconference2022@gmail.com

“ASEAS(UK) invites scholars and PhD students from all academic disciplines to submit panels or papers on any research topic within the field of Southeast Asian Studies.” see below for website:

Deep Cuts #17 – A.L. Becker and Burmese linguistic analysis

In linguistic anthropology, there is a theory called “linguistic relativity” (often described through the so-called Sapir-Whorf hypothesis, which never actually was advanced by either Sapir or Whorf, tbf) that holds that there is a recursive relationship between cognition/culture and language. Meaning that if your language is shaped a certain way, you will think about the world in a certain way; that if you and your kind think about the world in a certain way, your language may eventually come to reflect it. So, as an example, if your language has a strongly grammatically marked future tense, you may think about the future in different ways than languages that do not.

Anyway, A.L. Becker’s obscure writings on Burmese language probably could be described as taking the ling relativity hypothesis too far, but they are nonetheless pretty fascinating as suggestion rather than science: compelling us to open up our eyes to the way that language may operate on thought.

see here for PDFs and for the entire Cuts series.